Sir Thomas Wyatt’s “They Flee from Me” poetically describes the chase and loss of a mistress. The poem itself serves as a male sexual fantasy but strays from the literature of its time by incorporating rejection at the poem’s conclusion. This rejection serves as a literary power shift from man to woman and suggests that women, as well as men, are capable of using and manipulating their partners. The language of the poem, while clearly sexual, is also centralized around the concept of “hunting.” Speaking of his many mistresses, the speaker states that “they flee from me that sometime did me seek, with naked foot, stalking in my chamber. I have seen them gentle, tame, and meek, that now are wild and do not remember that sometime they put themselves in danger” (lines 1-5). In these lines, the women he is referring to are paired with verbs and adjectives that are commonly applied to the actual act of “hunting.” They are “stalked” in his chamber while barefoot (“naked foot”) which is representative of their inherent vulnerability. Additionally, they are described as “gentle, tame, and meek” and are later considered “wild.” These adjectives, while used to describe the women in the poem, are more commonly attributed animals being hunted. This relationship between mistresses and prey exposes the power that the male speaker holds over the women that he pursues. His elevation in status, however, is not permanent. Later in the poem, after detailing their sexual encounter, the writer gives the mistress a voice when she asks “dear heart, how like you this?” (line 14). This is the first instance of power being attributed to the woman – the man in the poem is made to answer to her, therefore showing a small shift in their roles. The speaker, softened by the intimacy of their encounter, goes on to say that “it was no dream: I lay broad waking. But all is turned through my gentleness, into a strange fashion of forsaking; and I have leave to go of her goodness, and she also, to use newfangleness” (lines 15-19). This instance ties into the title of the poem, “They Flee from Me” in the sense that after their sexual encounter, the mistress is the one to walk out on him. While not too heartbroken, the speaker is certainly surprised at the role reversal that has taken place after getting intimate with the woman in the poem. She uses him as a gateway into a world of “newfangleness” which is described literally as a fondness for novelty, fashion, and overall fickleness. The woman is able to enter into a realm of elevated status by using her sex appeal to get what she wants from the speaker in the same way that he used his status to get what he wanted out of her. When she is done with him, she casts him off in pursuit of bigger and better things. In essence, Sir Thomas Wyatt’s poem serves as a commentary on the dual manipulation of the sexes and exposes the underlying incentives behind such encounters between man and mistress.
Sir Thomas Wyatt (1503-1542)
They flee from me that Sometime did me Seek
1They flee from me that sometime did me seek
2With naked foot, stalking in my chamber.
3I have seen them gentle, tame, and meek,
4That now are wild and do not remember
5That sometime they put themself in danger
6To take bread at my hand; and now they range,
7Busily seeking with a continual change.
8Thanked be fortune it hath been otherwise
9Twenty times better; but once in special,
10In thin array after a pleasant guise,
11When her loose gown from her shoulders did fall,
12And she me caught in her arms long and small;
13Therewithall sweetly did me kiss
14And softly said, "dear heart, how like you this?"
15It was no dream: I lay broad waking.
16But all is turned thorough my gentleness
17Into a strange fashion of forsaking;
18And I have leave to go of her goodness,
19And she also, to use newfangleness.
20But since that I so kindly am served
21I would fain know what she hath deserved.
I kind of disagree with you about most of our poetry readings having happier endings. I feel as though they all had unreturned love, and this one isn't any different. In fact, most poetry about love doesn't end well for the narrator.
ReplyDeleteI also feel that a lot of poetry has hints of sexuality in it even if we can't necessarily immediately notice it. But I agree that this one is more open about it than most.
I didn't say that most of our poetry readings have happier endings - nor do I believe that. I was pointing out that this poem is unique in the way that it incorporates a type of rejection that reflects a shift in power. Like you said, a great deal of love poetry ends sadly, but this one ends strangely - with both parties walking away from it different than they entered (but not necessarily heartbroken).
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that this author pulls no punches when it comes to being openly sexual. The references to her naked body and her loose gown slipping off are clear indicators of what is happening.
I guess what I thought you meant by "strays from the literature of its time" was that you thought it ended more tragically then the other poems. But I now see what you mean since you explained.
ReplyDeleteGood show!
See my comments under "What's Got Me Responding". Excellent work.
ReplyDeleteI think that a lot of Wyatt's poems have to deal with lost love and his works seem to leave something unfulfilled. But, when I read this poem, it seems as though I didn't get as much sexual content as you did. When her gown began to fall off her shoulders was when I suspected a hint of a sexual theme. In some of my past English classes (specifically Brit Lit 2), I found that in reading some of the stories, slight suggestions as this can just be taken as a flirtation or a suggestion. Taking into account that this story is from a very different time period than some of the others, it may well be more sexual than I took it for. But I find it very interesting at how differently you interpreted the poem than me.
ReplyDeleteP.S. Awesome Rumination!
I highly agree with you that there is some real sexual undertones in this poem. However, after reading your rumination I found that the power behind the lady may have a more "monetary" connotation behind it.
ReplyDeleteWhen the lady takes "bread from my hand"(line 6) it feels to me like a payment has been transferred. She also asks him "dear heart, how you like this?" (Line 14) which could be interpreted as the lady being concerned that her customer is satisfied. I now suspect that the lady in this poem may be a prostitute. This rumination was excellent because it helped me look at this poem in a different light. I wonder if others see it this light as well now.
Jessica, when I first I read this poem, I did not see all of the sexuality that was involved (how could I have missed it!). Thanks, for this rumination. It is now obvious what Wyatt is referring to. I also, agree that it is a manipulation of the sexes and can understand why you think that. In these older times and even nowadays, men sometimes feel like it is okay for them to sleep with a woman or many women, but for a woman it is a double standard and gets looked upon differently.
ReplyDeleteDavid, after I read your post and reread those lines I agree that it is possible that the woman was a prostitute. Then, I rethink of the title, and think that the woman may have found another/better lover or if she were a prostitute, maybe the man involved in the poem (the writer) could have heart her in some way. If she was a prostitute, what made her leave him?
Another client possibly haha. The prostitute idea is a little bit of a stretch though. I think whether money is involved in their relationship is really a subjective opinion. In my mind, I tried to be like Wyatt and compared their relationship to the relationship a person has with animal. The person gets love and companionship from an animal and in return the animal gets bread or other food. This was just my reading but I think we can all agree that the woman definitely has control in this relationship.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading all of your comments, I still find it so interesting that after she is "hunted" and pursued, the woman is able to walk away from the man which typically isn't the case in a hunting scenario. Men hunt animals and keep them for themselves, not letting them get away again. Like David said, I understand that the person gets love and in turn the animal gets food, but I don't think its typical that the animal gets away from it's hunter. The prey usually doesn't have control over it's hunter which is why I think it's kind of surprising that the hunting metaphor is used and yet she still leaves him at the end of the poem.
ReplyDeleteJessica, I very much agree with your analysis. In line 10, Sir Thomas Wyatt writes, "In thin array, after a pleasant guise." I feel as if this line greatly suggests the degree of male fantasy for his mistress. Guise referring to great entertainment or performance behind masks, suggesting that the woman he is referring to is indeed a mistress because of the element of disguise. "Thin array," as well as, "long and small," refer to his mistress' body. The act of "stalking" and "taking the bread out of his hand" refers to a sense of male dominance and power. I think, overall, your rumination has excellent points and provides great insight into the analysis of the poem. However, even after reading your rumination, I still wonder about his level of care for her. Was it really just sexual fantasy that caused him confusion when she left, or was he heartbroken?
ReplyDeleteVery interesting points! I agree that it strays from the norms of literature from that time in that it doesn't deal with unrequited love. However, it does deal with a different, equally popular theme: sex. The difference, though, is that this poem states it almost explicitly, while usually in literature (especially in works that were set to music at the time), it is disguised as "death" or dying in someone's arms ex. Dowland's "Come again, Sweet Love" has the words "to see, to hear, to touch, to kiss, to die."
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I like the points you make, especially about role reversal, that women can be as manipulative as the men. It seems as though the narrator is a player, but in the end, he's played. You mention that he is not heart broken, but he does say "once in special." After reading this my initial thought was that the narrator was disappointed. Do you think maybe he had the idea that this relationship would be more than a fling?